[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: which MPI can we use
- To: petsc-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: which MPI can we use
- From: "Ondrej Certik" <ondrej@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 23:33:24 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=0lSYop+A3+hJF1YYQcVvztjnF/Mozbx43byriMkoDMM=; b=rVQtVfYjlyFlr29uh//CfpQvviLdgixX4n2s/PUd/XNn51713WVuOmSev8pN8K20wtguCOnHbai7PlwGWoK47zePt9wTXT2RRwrPzF9/Yp3bdLpqGuyAUhOluiTc97unrBBP3rWe7K50KMeN1YbL6fuZVGUZEXAtc6V5IkYG9Wg=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=lI9z5pF5c6MlZDwalmy3rYOEFZ7Wss7Ld/xz20Ryi5XcOdnotxRRvU1/GvMFix+2hZxMJWabYBRNLk89d0rXT6upvVsrygXjyb/b7qSUxtemz/h6nYGM7q7s4VY7ag4eiJhn/9S3Z3iTZ7AZ9qdfsTbf3XEohA4oc6nf8M8LQfw=
- In-reply-to: <e7ba66e40711280749n7c7bcf44wdd08d24f3c7f447e@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <428810f20711272224k116d77a3o12d60c9532052045@mail.gmail.com> <e7ba66e40711280749n7c7bcf44wdd08d24f3c7f447e@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: petsc-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-petsc-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Nov 28, 2007 4:49 PM, Lisandro Dalcin <dalcinl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 11/28/07, amjad ali <amjad11@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Please name the MPI libraries (other than MPICH2) which can be used
> > efficiently with PETSc?
>
> On Linux/GNU, surelly Open-MPI. You also have Intel-MPI (actually, it
> is based on MPICH2).
Yep, openmpi works nice. You can also use petsc4py with that. If you
use Debian, just install
python-petsc4py and you'll get everything installed with openmpi.
Ondrej