[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dual core performance estimate
- To: petsc-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Dual core performance estimate
- From: "Aron Ahmadia" <aja2111@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 15:53:13 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=cxU+h+oBWT5TcZuCDUhfUiSeID6USvUWTst83GxsG60=; b=fKlxAdTVl52Oo6PLavZHWL6k5uy/C/MfBR6wj/KZh5FLXw+I/FFpK2MLwniHgSVXlwmzLt/si5bAP5375rsNlCSSOF70rhREvCtS2vjF5jdjMt7Bo9+S0UwuhNRrw1Mop9RXulzic+Z8Q5qtdsNY5xGZUpYyxi2BTmNheGvg2Y8=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=N6oTOkF4cE5GZx4ypVVSs0DDt55vaTRQnlK+N/yN2JuQdTAOypRFfHeLO6iyFcGSDvy8u9K03bSzVJxlb57RO8P3ha4mrXRW0lIrcKLiH6dAErRDKoOISz0KneraxXCrw7avEZRwI09tPs4wtaSjhye8EMNdLhsvnkAfx+voOZM=
- In-reply-to: <804ab5d40711181234o2c7276b8q1de066c19342f29e@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <804ab5d40711181234o2c7276b8q1de066c19342f29e@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: petsc-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-petsc-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Ben,
You're asking a question that is very specific to the program you're
running. I think the general consensus on this list has been that for
the more common uses of PETSc, getting dual-cores will not speed up
your performance as much as dual-processors. For OS X, dual-cores are
pretty much the baseline now, so I wouldn't worry too much about it.
~A
On Nov 18, 2007 3:34 PM, Ben Tay <zonexo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> someone was talking abt core 2 duo performance on os x in some previous
> email. it seems that due to memory issues, it's not possible to get 2x the
> performance. there's also some mention of amd vs intel dual core.
>
> for computation using PETSc, is there any reason to buy one instead of the
> other? Also, supposed I use winxp + mpich2 + PETSc on a dual core, what sort
> of performance increase can we expect as compared to PETSc + nompi on the
> same machine?
>
> or is that too difficult an answer to give since there are too many factors?
>
> thank you
>
> regards