[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: which solving methods is more efficient to my problem.
- To: petsc-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: which solving methods is more efficient to my problem.
- From: RenZhengYong <renzhengyong@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 20:30:51 +0800
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=WrnDm988qup0Y3IGVlGylpcSDnnxV5Ofswxba59aLpw=; b=Ag7l3PR0mcXfhtX2Cx+tXOEkAHP0pqYxz4DjLZq/8xlOVDoVoacmSLCkRgCtN6cT7XnMCJS4YNOGChVMDxW8gWXKiBgT+Kknzn6QI3pG1NJh4Mi4yPv5HYqrwx5e58qludfZhnHP6R8hXnwdOTOEdxvGJwplr7VYKN4WbMYjfVo=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Bu/OE69KyKAh8F8NOF3xsn3ixcsfN05VkOQhLwYwOowdcA0n2+2BOqP7LfF2exQxMv7hEFyJwCg+HAtP4DnZHin6W5cN75gCvlJABmqORT27fvnF0JNQc8L72oeJzvJVDZEYAIHH//3ATxCKVFofjtS+c4QoNACz3pKN4x6Y6vo=
- In-reply-to: <7ff0ee010710062327i583253a8j3fd1bc6b95f62424@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <7ff0ee010710062327i583253a8j3fd1bc6b95f62424@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: petsc-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-petsc-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
I have did some similar job.
Based on my results, the AMG method is optimal.
On 10/7/07, Yujie <recrusader@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi, everyone
I am using adaptive mesh refinement to solve a
group of coupled steady-state linear PDEs. I will use PETSC as the
solver. Did anyone have experience in such problem. I want to know which solving method is more efficient, including iterative method and preconditioner. Thanks a lot.
Regards,
Yujie
--
Zhengyong Ren
School of Info-physics and Geomatics Engineering
DiXue Building, 3-322#,
Central South University, Hunan Province,China.
Postal code: 410083
Email: renzhengyong@xxxxxxxxx
Tel: +086013787102372.