[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Help me!
- To: petsc-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Help me!
- From: "Matthew Knepley" <knepley@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 08:15:14 -0500
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=WpfEHvDBJLDZ242Tl85BKbXvfgrSNSaJeLTadpbxVuSMPonjQiupNEwqYeUjo0It88XKnzZjzBHf6eazdyO0z/JUUe4dGj4I1t8QvcFvPgxA6sEkp7TmeUVnv9e3Br6Vl79y8kvKILV1yEo5JIagJRVWNbwePLz+TPR4tqkh04E=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CfxtFi+zkGw2t3EYhHUQDMQEpplDhHNbXhWI+Ri0Dkr0ZOWBXyFOQxQy72Hh41C7dqznBZ25i2gZv7Ytjo5v+8GQzx0xkavlabL8bFBqfKlQIFvB57+0dry9UOIKiQFj/QAjF1u2CZgyrrcCdNblA4bOwyYF0FQARan4OTtMSho=
- In-reply-to: <a414309d0705080612q21b306c3p2fa438436e93d029@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <a414309d0705080612q21b306c3p2fa438436e93d029@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: petsc-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-petsc-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
I am fairly sure that Metis and ParMetis use the same serial partitioner, or
at least it is possible to do so. There are a lot of options, and the particular
choice will affect performance.
Matt
On 5/8/07, Niriedith Karina <niriedith@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Everybody! :D
I used Metis and Parmetis for partitioning. And i see that metis is faster
than parmetis , so my question is.. for what number of elements is more
efficient use parmetis? ....
my mesh is a tetrahedra...
Thanks anyway!
--
The government saving money is like me spilling beer. It happens, but
never on purpose.