Re: need help with makefile

["P. Aaron Lott" <palott@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

All of the source files are first compiled using

mpif90 -C -g  -qdpc -qautodbl=dbl4 -qinitauto -Wl,-framework - 
Wl,vecLib  -c  file.f90

On each file, this creates the appropriate .o and .mod files. Also,  
these are compiled in order such that if a file B depends on a module  
defined in another file A, then A would be compiled before B

Then the executable is created by running

mpif90 -C -g  -qdpc -qautodbl=dbl4 -qinitauto -Wl,-framework - 
Wl,vecLib  -o executable  all_object_files.o


I'm attaching the Makefile here

Attachment: Makefile_no_petsc
Description: Binary data

-Aaron




On Mar 3, 2007, at 12:36 PM, Satish Balay wrote:

> What is the command that correctly compiles this file? [from your
> original makefile]
>
> Satish
>
> On Sat, 3 Mar 2007, P. Aaron Lott wrote:
>
> > Hi Satish,
> >
> > I tried the order of the use statements and the include, but it  
> > didn't seem to
> > matter. I really don't know much about make files or the linking  
> > process with
> > compilers but it seems like the compiler statement
> >
> > /usr/local/mpich-1.2.5.2/bin/mpif90 -c  -I. -g  __unsteady_ex.F -o
> > unsteady_ex.o
> >
> > is trying to make an object file unsteady_ex.o
> >
> > However, unsteady_ex.F depends on many other object files before  
> > this can be
> > compiled. During the make process the first file dealt with is  
> > unsteady_ex.F,
> > which before using petsc, unsteady_ex.f90 was the last to be  
> > compiled. It
> > seems like there should be some way to compile the rest of my  
> > program first
> > and then perform this step at the end.
> >
> >
> > I'm not sure if there's some way to rearrange things in the  
> > makefile command
> > in order to do this or not. Do you have any ideas?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -Aaron
> >
> >
> >
> > $(CMD)  : $(SOBJS)
> > 	-${FLINKER} $(FLAGS)  -o $(EXENAME) $(SOBJS)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mar 3, 2007, at 12:07 PM, Satish Balay wrote:
> >
> > > I can't spot any obvious issues here.. Is it possible that the
> > > #include should go after the 'use statements'? [I don't know enough
> > > about f90 issues here]
> > >
> > > Satish
> > >
> > > On Sat, 3 Mar 2007, P. Aaron Lott wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Satish,
> > > >
> > > > I'm attaching the file to this e-mail.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > -Aaron
> >
> > P. Aaron Lott
> > Ph.D. Candidate
> > 4239 Computer and Space Sciences Building
> > University of Maryland
> > College Park, MD 20742-4015
> >
> > palott@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.lcv.umd.edu/~palott
> > Office: 301.405.4894
> > Fax:      301.314.0827

P. Aaron Lott
Ph.D. Candidate
4239 Computer and Space Sciences Building
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742-4015

palott@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.lcv.umd.edu/~palott
Office: 301.405.4894
Fax:      301.314.0827