[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: about Unstructured Meshes
- To: petsc-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: about Unstructured Meshes
- From: "Matthew Knepley" <knepley@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 13:42:16 -0600
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FFGVOwdZJMlA+sk6OYJQJJZ2/5tJP+2LY9CPbQSwPXu0AtETxbnBLXnkt/vscon5n20W7lrVEOY5iK2bmWGddMT7jDGzabPAcPxetxYq06VVrfMUJ46/PwAS14pZDBNCyMfQg1Sg4XJLW4e1KxVxDvess8NS1EeXg60AKkRPO/4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=RSf3SVhQNPSIdsLye2SJYp+d3G/cvO/u1QtP+jNduGc3AMZ/q8yg1bXZsykWyyqSOUbBM3gvqL9nwoft2TygmL+9llPGdXUNW4xFQm7Tg73jJCUAl3dXnPqehdZig7CBoGAuuJQFizObmapEp2UOMz7w+ryLpxZA4//844g9mks=
- In-reply-to: <63516a2e0703021134q136b96edl34f3c3c62532a263@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <a414309d0702230708y6162de61gfd75156d2a3dbcf5@mail.gmail.com> <a9f269830702230713k5d3c94bcw9aba8ba51689cd6@mail.gmail.com> <63516a2e0703021134q136b96edl34f3c3c62532a263@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: petsc-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-petsc-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
On 3/2/07, Jianing Shi <jianings@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Actually, I have a very similar question for unstructured meshes.
I took a look at the tutorial in PETSc using meshes. Looks like there
is a mixture programming of meshes (written in OOP) and the PETSc
solver. Looks very complicated, I must say.
Well, in my experience, implementing this is usually 100 times more
complicated, so I invite you prove me wrong.
Besides, what would be a golden packages using meshes that would work
with PETSc? Say, PETSc (solver) + ParMetis (partition meshes) + Some
sort of mesh generators (I don't what)?
I do not understand the question.
Matt
Jianing
--
One trouble is that despite this system, anyone who reads journals widely
and critically is forced to realize that there are scarcely any bars to eventual
publication. There seems to be no study too fragmented, no hypothesis too
trivial, no literature citation too biased or too egotistical, no design too
warped, no methodology too bungled, no presentation of results too
inaccurate, too obscure, and too contradictory, no analysis too self-serving,
no argument too circular, no conclusions too trifling or too unjustified, and
no grammar and syntax too offensive for a paper to end up in print. --
Drummond Rennie