Re: about memory type

To: petsc-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: about memory type
From: "Matthew Knepley" <knepley@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 06:00:18 -0600
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eHgVjsOFnTkH7qWnoOImjLBlMsNAmHcapgUdarV5pCHv2o3dwJedl10B7ZMXaiUkVvtV1rRlkqMa3z9vJy5mINlN3oikdJTrUPF1X2joz3B9Cy9dHqNvcMZ9jtKEwrD9uVTf6dLS13ygHaZp/Bmlmt+HC6sxNiAalKEKW5LsDjI=
In-reply-to: <002801c71455$889ffaf0$3364a8c0@dmrc6700512>
References: <002801c71455$889ffaf0$3364a8c0@dmrc6700512>
Reply-to: petsc-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-petsc-users@xxxxxxxxxxx

On 11/30/06, Yixun Liu <yxliu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

Which memory type, e.g. share or distributed memory, is most suitable to
PETSC?


The parallel performance of PETSc depends of that of MPI. If built correctly,
good performance can be achieved on either architecture.

  Matt

Cheers
Yixun

--
"Failure has a thousand explanations. Success doesn't need one" -- Sir
Alec Guiness