[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How come it is PetscEvent but all the routines that act on it are PetscLogEventXXXX()?
- To: petsc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: How come it is PetscEvent but all the routines that act on it are PetscLogEventXXXX()?
- From: "Matthew Knepley" <knepley@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 19:39:15 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=SxG52xCp9ne6uYbmj68u4uX2122lAs6s0O7ZU1T0wHU=; b=nhkxCOsRqzBHjMW9c6BjZHF31ehInW6K0LIPT1K8id8xVwFDlMCkvdECW1hDLqbaU1+zsUkvxfQSwbyJ59dYSyMUNtINPW2FAloeT8Izp+nmObtP4Jyb0TpgyGfJ+yOcbortB2pewclbnNu+kCv7mgDQ8aYzAiRwgNmKv/5fGJk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nAsX1xxh5skPr7bXC6zkY6w9GL/ht6m3tKi78phUNUK7JFsxm5CHE7hTCOJts3WtM69MDdAkrP2xjrA94gRRLJHVf7tm6bz8IC9XVLUPqGevV6M8tDJsa8qf0IJNyaA48usNCHHySipnco0r/FPa0yq6uZTt6tvEYHMHBoxj8FA=
- In-reply-to: <6ED818D3-A407-4D2D-A057-1254DB32E975@mcs.anl.gov>
- References: <6ED818D3-A407-4D2D-A057-1254DB32E975@mcs.anl.gov>
- Reply-to: petsc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-petsc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Actually, I would argue that these methods do not actually act on PetscEvent
at all (which is just an integer), but rather on a PetscLog. That is why I named
them that way.
Matt
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Doesn't seem right.
>
> Barry
>
>
--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which
their experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener