[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
PetscTryMethod and PetscUseMethod
- To: petsc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: PetscTryMethod and PetscUseMethod
- From: "Lisandro Dalcin" <dalcinl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 16:48:01 -0300
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=bn7Lad5YisjArBn80ErlKwcA+dzVizdcxn1XIxzpiFM=; b=P4B7xX3lGYp17+I4FLkuCX/dwMAodHXSm2BnNvXin7XPcXo+ZQE90W7GcEViaukmRDJYEuv8TwNA9q6zLd6Z+lX9XmawcxEmephl6xGWfNixdzEQgwe12+6fvzWNknv2u1SVspjp41Rx7bc8PGEjAZZd7Jxn7ysj+iH/yVzIp1k=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Fh8B/MAQa/9K3revc+QXRIe+OMLKP8rW+oJaLDKU2FCr1r9LM6rOHvXMMUZ05AU9/X1diTYnaJ4nGFuk31q9Yqd6jLSjKxlFtCV4s7+pNnDQtZQlJ8/cEeZYbfBo1rwgReV/aaFux5ZKRfnn7j/QJ0EV7gXHhK/26UwQ2B9UHC0=
- Reply-to: petsc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-petsc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
PetscTryMethod(obj,A,B,C) and PetscUseMethod(obj,A,B,C) macros are not
consistent regarding parameter 'A', the first expand it to '#A' and de
second do not.
Should this be fixed? Which version do you want? I'm personally
inclined to the second (that is, no 'stingize', as looks a bit more
explicit in code)
Regards,
--
Lisandro Dalcín
---------------
Centro Internacional de Métodos Computacionales en Ingeniería (CIMEC)
Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química (INTEC)
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)
PTLC - Güemes 3450, (3000) Santa Fe, Argentina
Tel/Fax: +54-(0)342-451.1594