[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [AG-TECH] RAT on 64bit RedHat

To: "Ashley Wright" <a2.wright@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [AG-TECH] RAT on 64bit RedHat
From: "Piers O'Hanlon" <p.ohanlon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 23:57:16 +0000
Cc: "ag-tech@xxxxxxxxxxx" <ag-tech@xxxxxxxxxxx>, accessgrid-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=TRdg5gw6Nd4LCy5AppdOtq1eFGCku6H0BDiNkHFue1qQReclG+3uz2cdRb0wDvEvJTepQtfkDUDNoyaZCqIJh9rmqMMsfbh+nyfvCwNbPFCfUY4Be4l7rrgZM6Zao4e9oyOpBmw7QoaMoNqrfIF+t9IRW+XQ4ZE5J5fOHHMmHqA=
In-reply-to: <45D243B3.70401@qut.edu.au>
References: <45D243B3.70401@qut.edu.au>
Sender: owner-ag-tech@xxxxxxxxxxx

Hi,


We are running AG 2 & 3 on a x86_64 RedHat EL4 machine (FC3 RPMS), and
our RAT displays SSIDs where it should be displaying site names.

Has anyone come across this before, and know of a solution.

Do you see this problem in all venues? Can you verify that you are
receiving the RTCP (session_portnum+1)packets on the machine? (ie
they're not being firewalled)

Piers.

Thanks in advance,
Ashley

--
Ashley Wright
HPC and Research Support Group
Queensland University of Technology (QUT)

Ph:     (07) 3138 9236
Mobile: (04) 0531 3124
QUT:    #66866
Email:  a2.wright@xxxxxxxxxx

References:
- [AG-TECH] RAT on 64bit RedHat
  - From: Ashley Wright

Prev by Date: [AG-TECH] RAT on 64bit RedHat
Next by Date: Re: [AG-TECH] RAT on 64bit RedHat
Previous by thread: [AG-TECH] RAT on 64bit RedHat
Next by thread: Re: [AG-TECH] RAT on 64bit RedHat
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread