[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [AG-TECH] Packet Loss

To: "Andrew.Rowley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <Andrew.Rowley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [AG-TECH] Packet Loss
From: Chris Kendrick <kendrick@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:33:06 +1000
Cc: "ag-tech@xxxxxxxxxxx" <ag-tech@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1156809326.2450.23.camel@sys04.vpac.org>
References: <20060824090009313.00000004100@rosie> <1156809326.2450.23.camel@sys04.vpac.org>
Sender: owner-ag-tech@xxxxxxxxxxx

Opps, slip of the toung, we are on aarnet, we just don't have a
multicast connection to it.

On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 09:55 +1000, Chris Kendrick wrote:
> Our bridge is on the same subnet as our AG Nodes.  So if the AG node
> can't to multicast to the Bristol VV neither can our bridge.  We are
> not
> on AARNET.  We are on Grangenet.  I don't know if Grangenet peers to
> JANET.  But when I go to the Bristol VV I don't get any audio/video
> feeds if I don't switch to unicast.

References:
- RE: [AG-TECH] Packet Loss
  - From: Andrew A Rowley
- RE: [AG-TECH] Packet Loss
  - From: Chris Kendrick

Prev by Date: RE: [AG-TECH] Packet Loss
Next by Date: Re: [AG-TECH] Packet Loss
Previous by thread: RE: [AG-TECH] Packet Loss
Next by thread: RE: [AG-TECH] Packet Loss
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread