Re: [AG-TECH] Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 06:12:18 -0500

["Thomas D. Uram" <turam@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Joseph:

We track bugs in bugzilla, here:

http://bugzilla.mcs.anl.gov/AccessGrid

I did tell you that we were aware of a problem with
vic.  There was a bug report regarding this problem,
and a patch submitted to address it, and testing to
confirm that it worked:

http://bugzilla.mcs.anl.gov/accessgrid/show_bug.cgi?id=1228

If you're seeing behavior different from what's described
in the bug report, it would be helpful if you could do some
testing to determine how the behavior is different, and attach
your results to bug 1228. 

I've regarded this problem as fixed, so if it's not, I'd like
to know.

Thanks,
Tom


On 7/21/06 6:12 AM, Joseph Stone wrote:
> I think I promised Tom that I'd get this into bugtrack and will need to
> figure out how to do that (probably have to learn how to spell it, too).
>
> RAT does a nice job of sending out packets on all udp ports that need 
> to be
> opened for inbound traffic.  Many of the firewalls we deal with do a nice
> job of supporting two way audio as a result.
>
> Vic isn't so nice.  It seems to send out udp packets on one of the 
> essential
> ports (outbound video works) but doesn't send packets on the other 
> port (n+1
> : the one for incoming video streams) so those participants with 
> firewalls
> (that worked for RAT) are seen but can't see.
>
> Did I understand that there was a version of vic written to overcome this
> and that it could be copied into the appropriate place in AGTK 2.4
> installations.
>
> Joseph Stone
> Senior Informatics Manager
> Family Medicine Community Health, Medical School, Univ. of Minnesota
> Suite 220 Dinnaken
> 925 Delaware St. SE
> Minneapolis, MN 55414
>
> (612) 624-3192
> stone004@xxxxxxx