sorry about that. I did mean July 5.
Mike
monika.k.rabarison wrote:
Mike meant July 5th Townhall.
-Monika
Tom,
Monica Rabarison expressed an interest in having a meeting
to discuss mutlicast issues and troubleshooting for the
access grid. (see below some of the email we have been
sending.) I have found two people who are willing to
participate in this. Mike O'Conner from ESNet and Greg Bell from
LBLNet. Mike is willing to give the
presentation and Greg is willing to help answer
questions. The first question is can this be done at the
8 am townhall on July 7 (Mike can only do the 8 am presentation)
The second question is what kind of
discussion do you think would be good to present.
Thank you,
Mike
Mike O'Connor wrote:
Mike,
Sure, July 5 for the 8AM pacific meeting is fine, I'll
have to decline the later meeting.
We should talk about the audience and topic of
discussion. >
-Mike
Michael Elmore wrote:
Mike,
I just heard from Greg and he said that July 5 is ok
with him. He >> also said he would be willing to attend
and help answer questions. >> Mike would you be willing
and could you have a presentation available >> by July 5?
Also, there are usually two meetings for the town hall.
One at 8 am pacific and one at 4 pm pacific. Could
you and would >> you be willing to do both meetings. If
you can only do the morning >> one it would be fine.
Thank you,
Mike
monika.k.rabarison wrote:
Hi Mike,
July 5th is fine for me.
Thanks,
Monika
Monica et al.,
I was wondering if it would be ok to do the meeting
at the >>>> July 5 townhall. I will be on vacation for
all of the >>>> dates you listed. Is this ok for MIke
and Greg? >>>> Thank you,
Mike
monika.k.rabarison wrote:
Hi all,
Any date/time except June 10, 13, and 17 is fine for
me. >>>>>
Thanks,
Monika
Hello Greg and MIke,
I received this from Monika about the content of
the >>>>>> meeting. The date is not set. If you can't
meet at >>>>>> Brookhaven on the 7th, then we could schedule this
for >>>>>> another time. Monika, do you
have another date in mind? >>>>>> Thank you, Mike
monika.k.rabarison wrote:
Mike,
the session is mainly intended for network
personel but >>>>>>>
node >ops too could benefit from it. When the idea
came >>>>>>
up >>, what >everyone wanted was mostly about how to
know >>>> that >>there is a >multicast problem and how to
fix the >>>> problem, >>and also >re-explain how the AG is
using >>>> multicast. There >>is already >an AGDP doc
about these but >>>> apparently >>everyone (mostly node
operators) wanted to >>>> have the >>network people
attend such a >session. It looks >>>> like in >>many cases
, the network person is >not very >>>> familiar with >>the
AG and the node operator is not >very >>>> familiar with
networking! How technical it should be? >>>>
I'm not very sure >>about this. >
Thanks again,
Monika
Monica,
I have talked to Greg and he is not sure what he
can >>>>>>>> prepare for a meeting like this. How
technical he >>>>>>>>
can >>>>make it etc. He would like to know more
specifically >>>>
what >>you would like to get out of a multicast
presentation. >>Thank you and have a good weekend.
Mike
monika.k.rabarison wrote:
Mike,
Please do so. June 7 sounds good to me. If it is
too >>>>>>>>>
close >for the presenter(s) any time would do, I
guess. >>>>
Thanks again,
Monika
Monica,
Would you like me to ask the networking people
if >>>>>>>>>>
they >>>>>>would like to give a presentation? If so
then >>>> maybe >>>>>>
they >>could do the presentation at the next
Town >>>>>>>>
Hall >>>>
on >>June >>7. One of the people might have a
problem with 8 >>>>>> >>am, but >>I can find out. Let me
know or let >>>>>>
me >>know >>about another >>time. Thank you,
Mike
monika.k.rabarison wrote:
Hi Mike,
Thank you indeed for your response. You are
right >>>>>>>>>>>
nobody >>>
has >replied to this suggestion yet. I am
cc-ing >>>>>>>>>>
Alex >>>>>>
as >>>>they are >also interested in such a session
at >>>>>> TACC. >>>>Having the talk >on a Town Hall is a
great >>>>>>
idea. >>I am >>>>thinking that the >summer might not
be a >>>> good >>time as >>>>people go on vacation.
Anyway, we >>>> could have >>it >>>>
whenever >>the speakers are >available.
Best Regards,
Monika
Monika,
Sorry for not responding to this earlier. I
haven't >>>>>>>>
seen >>any other responses either. I am not
willing >>>>>>
to >>>>lead >>such a meeting, but I am willing to
try >>>>>>
and >>get >>>>
a >>speaker >>for you. One of the Network people
at >>>>>>>>
LBNL >>is >>quite >>versed in Multicasting and I
think >>>>>> that he >>might >>be >>willing to give a
talk and I >>>>>>
could >>try to >>get the >>person >>at ESNet who
isolates >>>> the >>multicast >>troubles on >>ESNet. >>Let
me know what you >>>> >>think. Maybe >>it could be
done on a >>Town Hall >>>>
meeting. Thank you, >>
Mike
monika.k.rabarison wrote:
Hi everybody,
A suggestion poped up at the AG retreat on
organizing >>>>>>>
an >>>
AG >session for network staff.
The idea is to have one person or more share
knowledge, >>>>>how-tos, tips, etc...on AG
network >>>>>>>> support. How does >>>>>
that >>>sound? Is there anyone out there
willing to >>>>>>>>>>
lead >>>>such >>>session? Node operators too would
indeed >>benefit >>>>
from it >>>
as >some of us (at least myself)are not very
network >>>>>>>>"literate". >
Thanks,
Monika
>>>>>>>>>>>>