Monica et al.,
I was wondering if it would be ok to do the meeting at the
July 5 townhall. I will be on vacation for all of the
dates you listed. Is this ok for MIke and Greg?
Thank you,
Mike
monika.k.rabarison wrote:
Hi all,
Any date/time except June 10, 13, and 17 is fine for me.
Thanks,
Monika
Hello Greg and MIke,
I received this from Monika about the content of the
meeting. The date is not set. If you can't meet at
Brookhaven on the 7th, then we could schedule this for
another time. Monika, do you have another date in mind?
Thank you, Mike
monika.k.rabarison wrote:
Mike,
the session is mainly intended for network personel but
node >ops too could benefit from it. When the idea came
up >>, what >everyone wanted was mostly about how to know
that >>there is a >multicast problem and how to fix the
problem, >>and also >re-explain how the AG is using
multicast. There >>is already >an AGDP doc about these but
apparently >>everyone (mostly node >operators) wanted to
have the >>network people attend such a >session. It looks
like in >>many cases, the network person is >not very
familiar with >>the AG and the node operator is not >very
familiar with >>networking! How technical it should be?
I'm not very sure >>about this. >
Thanks again,
Monika
Monica,
I have talked to Greg and he is not sure what he can
prepare for a meeting like this. How technical he
can >>>>make it etc. He would like to know more
specifically >>>>
what >>you would like to get out of a multicast
presentation. >>Thank you and have a good weekend.
Mike
monika.k.rabarison wrote:
Mike,
Please do so. June 7 sounds good to me. If it is too
close >for the presenter(s) any time would do, I
guess. >>>>
Thanks again,
Monika
Monica,
Would you like me to ask the networking people if
they >>>>>>would like to give a presentation? If so then
maybe >>>>>>
they >>could do the presentation at the next Town
Hall >>>>
on >>June >>7. One of the people might have a problem with 8 >>am,
but >>I can find out. Let me know or let
me >>know >>about another >>time. Thank you,
Mike
monika.k.rabarison wrote:
Hi Mike,
Thank you indeed for your response. You are right
nobody >>>
has >replied to this suggestion yet. I am cc-ing
Alex >>>>>>
as >>>>they are >also interested in such a session at
TACC. >>>>Having the talk >on a Town Hall is a great
idea. >>I am >>>>thinking that the >summer might not be a
good >>time as >>>>people go on vacation. >Anyway, we
could have >>it >>>>
whenever >>the speakers are >available.
Best Regards,
Monika
Monika,
Sorry for not responding to this earlier. I
haven't >>>>>>>>
seen >>any other responses either. I am not
willing >>>>>>
to >>>>lead >>such a meeting, but I am willing to try
and >>get >>>>
a >>speaker >>for you. One of the Network people at
LBNL >>is >>quite >>versed in Multicasting and I think
that he >>might >>be >>willing to give a talk and I
could >>try to >>get the >>person >>at ESNet who isolates
the >>multicast >>troubles on >>ESNet. >>Let me know what you
>>think. Maybe >>it could be >>done on a >>Town Hall
meeting. Thank you, >>
Mike
monika.k.rabarison wrote:
Hi everybody,
A suggestion poped up at the AG retreat on
organizing >>>>>>>
an >>>
AG >session for network staff.
The idea is to have one person or more share
knowledge, >>>>>how-tos, tips, etc...on AG network
support. How does >>>>>
that >>>sound? Is there anyone out there willing to
lead >>>>such >>>session? Node operators too would
indeed >>benefit >>>>
from it >>>
as >some of us (at least myself)are not very
network >>>>>>>>"literate". >
Thanks,
Monika